Similarities

b/n GurlZ and WindowS


  • Both have a great UI.
  • Both consume large resources and do less work.
  • Both crash unexpectedly.
  • Both are not easily portable on different architectures (environment).
  • Both can’t work on low resource architectures (environment).
  • Both are costly to maintain.
  • Both give mostly unexpected outputs.
  • Both working often contradicts with their documentation.
  • Both are easily prone to viruses (rumors and doubts) (and they (viruses) do spread very fast in windows based networks).
  • In spite of all above disadvantages, both are liked.

BoyZ and LinuX


  • Both have an average UI.
  • Both are robust.
  • Both are highly secure.
  • Both can be easily modified to support new Concepts / features.
  • Both are highly efficient.
  • Both are easily portable to any architecture (environment) no matter how low are resources.
  • You can easily guess the output for your input (in Linux just open its code, for boys they are mostly transparent by nature).
  • Both provide large support for development (work environment).
  • Both are poorly documented
Contributed By: Modified By: n4zr
Mohammed Imran Ali

Network Engineer

AL-Muhaidib Technical Supplies

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s